Choosing the Right Vector Database for Your RAG System

You’ve decided to build a RAG system. Now you need a vector database to store and search your embeddings.

You have options: Pinecone, Weaviate, Milvus, Qdrant, Chroma, and others. Each has different tradeoffs.

This guide helps you choose.

What Vector Databases Do

Vector databases store embeddings (vectors) and find similar ones quickly.

Document: "How do I reset my password?"
↓
Embedding: [0.23, -0.51, 0.89, 0.12, ...]
↓
Vector Database (stores millions of embeddings)
↓
New Question: "Password reset steps"
Embedding: [0.25, -0.48, 0.91, 0.14, ...]
↓
Search: Find similar embeddings
Result: Returns "How do I reset my password?" document

Comparison: The Key Factors

1. Deployment Model

Pinecone:

• Managed cloud service
• Fully hosted by Pinecone
• No infrastructure to manage
• Pay per usage

Weaviate:

• Self-hosted or managed cloud
• You control the infrastructure
• More flexibility
• More operational responsibility

Milvus:

• Self-hosted only
• You manage everything
• Maximum control
• Maximum operational burden

2. Ease of Use

Pinecone:

• Simplest to get started
• API-first design
• Good documentation
• Minimal configuration

Weaviate:

• Moderate learning curve
• GraphQL + REST APIs
• Good documentation
• Some configuration needed

Milvus:

• Steeper learning curve
• Complex deployment
• Requires DevOps knowledge
• Significant configuration

3. Cost Structure

Pinecone:

• $0.25 per pod-hour (baseline)
• $0.25 per million vectors stored
• $0.10 per million read units
• Transparent pricing

Example: 1 million vectors, light usage = ~$200/month

Weaviate:

• Self-hosted: Infrastructure costs only
• Managed: $500-5,000/month depending on scale
• More predictable for large scale

Milvus:

• Self-hosted: Infrastructure costs only
• Typically cheapest at scale
• Requires DevOps investment

4. Scalability

Pinecone:

• Scales automatically
• Handles billions of vectors
• No manual scaling needed
• Limited by API rate limits

Weaviate:

• Scales with cluster size
• Can handle millions to billions
• Manual scaling required
• Good horizontal scaling

Milvus:

• Scales with cluster size
• Can handle billions of vectors
• Manual scaling required
• Excellent for massive scale

5. Features

Pinecone:

• Metadata filtering
• Sparse-dense search
• Namespaces (data isolation)
• Pod types (performance vs. cost)

Weaviate:

• Metadata filtering
• Hybrid search (vector + keyword)
• GraphQL queries
• Built-in LLM integration

Milvus:

• Metadata filtering
• Multiple index types
• Scalar filtering
• Advanced search options

Detailed Comparison Table

When to Use Each

Use Pinecone if:

• You want to launch quickly
• You don’t want to manage infrastructure
• You’re okay with managed service costs
• You want simple, reliable operations
• You have < 100 million vectors

Use Weaviate if:

• You want flexibility in deployment
• You need hybrid search (vector + keyword)
• You want a balance of simplicity and control
• You have 10 million to 1 billion vectors
• You want GraphQL queries

Use Milvus if:

• You have massive scale (> 1 billion vectors)
• You want to minimize costs
• You have DevOps expertise
• You need fine-grained control
• You’re building internal infrastructure

Real-World Examples

Startup Building Customer Support Chatbot

Requirements:

• 100,000 support documents
• Quick launch (weeks, not months)
• Limited DevOps team
• Budget: $500/month

Solution: Pinecone

• Set up in 1 day
• Estimated cost: $300/month
• No infrastructure management
• Focus on product, not ops

Enterprise Building Internal Knowledge Base

Requirements:

• 50 million documents
• Hybrid search needed
• Existing infrastructure team
• Budget: $5,000/month

Solution: Weaviate (managed)

• Flexibility for enterprise needs
• Hybrid search for better results
• Managed deployment reduces ops burden
• Estimated cost: $3,000/month

Large Tech Company Building AI Platform

Requirements:

• 10 billion vectors
• Minimize costs
• Strong DevOps team
• Budget: $50,000/month infrastructure

Solution: Milvus

• Self-hosted for cost control
• Estimated cost: $15,000/month
• Massive scale support
• Full operational control

Integration with Calliope

Pinecone:

Calliope Chat Studio → Pinecone → Instant setup

Weaviate:

Calliope AI Lab → Weaviate → Custom pipelines

Milvus:

Calliope Langflow → Milvus → Visual workflow builder

Migration Path

Start with Pinecone for simplicity. As you scale:

1. Growth phase: Monitor costs
2. Scale phase: Evaluate Weaviate for flexibility
3. Massive scale: Consider Milvus for cost optimization

You can migrate between them without losing data.

The Vector Database Checklist

When choosing:

• What’s your vector count? (determines scale needs)
• What’s your deployment preference? (cloud vs. self-hosted)
• Do you need hybrid search? (vector + keyword)
• What’s your budget? (managed vs. self-hosted)
• Do you have DevOps resources? (for self-hosted)
• What’s your growth trajectory? (affects scalability needs)
• Do you need specific features? (metadata filtering, etc.)
• What’s your time to launch? (quick vs. optimized)

The Bottom Line

For most teams starting out: Pinecone

• Simplest to use
• Fastest to launch
• Reasonable costs at small scale

For teams needing flexibility: Weaviate

• Good balance of simplicity and control
• Hybrid search capabilities
• Managed or self-hosted options

For massive scale: Milvus

• Best cost at scale
• Requires DevOps expertise
• Maximum control

Start simple. Scale deliberately. Choose the database that matches your needs today, not your dreams for tomorrow.

Pricing Note: Vector database pricing changes frequently. The costs mentioned here are current as of early 2025. Always verify current pricing with providers before making infrastructure decisions. Pinecone, Weaviate, and Milvus all update their pricing models periodically.

Build RAG systems with Calliope →