preloader
blog post

Deployment Topologies: Hub Models for Enterprise AI

author image

One Hub or Many? Choosing Your AI Architecture

Enterprise AI deployment isn’t one-size-fits-all. Some organizations need centralized control. Others need distributed autonomy. Many need both.

Calliope supports multiple deployment topologies to match how your organization actually works.

Topology Options

Single Centralized Hub: One Calliope instance serves the entire organization.

Multiple Distributed Hubs: Separate instances per team, region, or business unit.

Hub and Spoke: Central hub with peered satellite deployments.

Federated: Independent hubs with shared governance.

Single Centralized Hub

[All Users]
     ↓
[Central Calliope Hub]
     ↓
[All Data Sources]

Best for:

  • Smaller organizations
  • Uniform compliance requirements
  • Centralized IT operations
  • Single geographic region

Advantages:

  • Simplest to manage
  • Consistent policies everywhere
  • Single point of governance
  • Unified audit trail
  • Lower infrastructure cost

Considerations:

  • Single point of failure
  • Latency for distant users
  • All data flows through one location
  • May not meet data residency requirements

Multiple Distributed Hubs

[Team A Users] → [Team A Hub] → [Team A Data]

[Team B Users] → [Team B Hub] → [Team B Data]

[Region X Users] → [Region X Hub] → [Region X Data]

Best for:

  • Large enterprises with autonomous business units
  • Strict data residency requirements
  • Air-gapped or isolated networks
  • Teams with very different requirements

Advantages:

  • Data stays local to each unit
  • Independent scaling per hub
  • Failure isolation
  • Can meet varied compliance requirements
  • Low latency for local users

Considerations:

  • More infrastructure to manage
  • Policies must be coordinated manually
  • No unified view across organization
  • Higher total cost

Hub and Spoke (Peered)

              [Central Hub]
             /      |      \
            /       |       \
    [Spoke A]   [Spoke B]   [Spoke C]
        ↓           ↓           ↓
   [Local Users] [Local Users] [Local Users]

Best for:

  • Global organizations with regional presence
  • Central governance with local execution
  • Data residency with unified management
  • Mixed cloud and on-premise

Advantages:

  • Central policy management
  • Local data processing
  • Unified governance, distributed execution
  • Flexible scaling per spoke
  • Reduced latency for regional users

How it works:

  • Central hub defines policies, manages governance
  • Spokes inherit policies, process locally
  • Data stays in spoke region
  • Audit aggregates to central (or stays local)
  • Users connect to nearest spoke

Federated Model

[Hub A] ←——→ [Hub B] ←——→ [Hub C]
   ↓              ↓              ↓
[Users A]    [Users B]     [Users C]

Best for:

  • Mergers and acquisitions
  • Partner ecosystems
  • Highly autonomous divisions
  • Consortiums

Advantages:

  • Full autonomy per hub
  • Selective sharing between hubs
  • Can evolve independently
  • Supports complex organizational structures

Considerations:

  • Most complex to coordinate
  • Policy alignment requires governance process
  • Cross-hub workflows need explicit configuration

Choosing Your Topology

Ask these questions:

QuestionIf Yes → Consider
Single location, unified team?Centralized
Strict data residency per region?Distributed or Hub/Spoke
Central IT, distributed users?Hub and Spoke
Autonomous business units?Distributed or Federated
Air-gapped environments?Distributed with isolated hubs
Global with central governance?Hub and Spoke
M&A or partnerships?Federated

Common Patterns

By Region:

  • Hub per geography (Americas, EMEA, APAC)
  • Data stays in region
  • Central governance coordination

By Business Unit:

  • Hub per division
  • Independent budgets and policies
  • Shared platform standards

By Network:

  • Hub per network zone
  • Corporate, production, air-gapped
  • Security boundary alignment

By Compliance:

  • Hub per compliance regime
  • HIPAA environment separate from general
  • PCI environment isolated

Migration Paths

Start simple, grow as needed:

Phase 1: Single centralized hub Phase 2: Add regional spokes as you expand Phase 3: Federate for acquisitions or partners

Or:

Phase 1: Hub per business unit (distributed) Phase 2: Add central governance layer Phase 3: Full hub-and-spoke with policy inheritance

Governance Across Topologies

Centralized: Single policy set, simple Distributed: Independent policies per hub Hub and Spoke: Central policies inherited by spokes, local customization allowed Federated: Shared policy frameworks, independent enforcement

Zentinelle supports policy inheritance and coordination across topologies.

Infrastructure Considerations

TopologyInfrastructureManagementCost
CentralizedSingle clusterSimplestLowest
DistributedMultiple independentPer-hubHigher
Hub/SpokeCentral + edgeCoordinatedMedium
FederatedMultiple linkedComplexHighest

The Topology Decision Checklist

Choosing your deployment topology:

  • Where are users located?
  • Where must data reside?
  • How autonomous are business units?
  • What are the compliance boundaries?
  • What’s the IT management capacity?
  • What’s the budget for infrastructure?
  • How might this evolve over time?

The right topology matches your organization, not a vendor’s preference.

Discuss deployment topology with our team →

Related Articles